Frequently Asked Question

This set of frequently asked questions aims to provide clarity on key aspects of AGD’s Project Governance, a process that is vital to our organization so that we can better understand our governance structures, practices, and policies. The goal is to ensure they align with their mission and contribute to their overall effectiveness.

How are these models different from AGD’s current model?

AGD’s current governance model was developed in the 70s and 80s, and it's governance and decision-making structure and processes need to evolve to meet the needs of members in this changing world. It has been stated by members that the process of decision making within the organization can be very slow. AGD operates in a competitive landscape where general dentists have more choices for CE and community. Governance must be structured to be proactive, flexible, member-focused, strategic, inclusive, and able anticipate and meet the needs of members and engage the broader general dentistry community. (View current model or compare the current and new models for comparison.)

Who has the ultimate oversight of AGD in these models?

In these models, the Board has oversight of the organization, however both of the models allow for members to have a greater voice in its policies, processes and mission.

How are AGD officers selected now?

In AGD’s current models, officers run for office and are elected by the AGD House of Delegates. Officers include vice president, secretary, treasurer, speaker of the house, and editor. Once elected vice president, that officer moves to president-elect and the president.

How will officers be elected in the new models?

In these models, officers are elected by a vote of the entire AGD membership. The slate is presented to the entire membership; and unless a petition of 10% of members presents an alternative slate within 30 days, slate is approved.

Which of these models have a House of Delegates? Will there be an annual meeting for oversight of AGD’s policies and other operational details?

There is no House of Delegates in either of these models, however there is a Leadership Advisory Assembly in both that operates as a think-tank and will discuss policies, issues impacting general dentistry from across the country, and critical research to bring to the Board so that the AGD can continue to advance in the direction of the interests of the membership. The models currently show that the Leadership Advisory Assembly  would have one annual face-to-face meeting and three virtual quarterly meetings.

Where can I register for a Town Hall meeting to learn more about the models?

Town hall meetings will be held virtually for further explanations of thse models. Register here.

Do either of the new models change the AGD constituent structure? Will the constituents lose any of their autonomy or assets if this passes? 

No. There is no change to the constituent structure in either of these models.

How would either of these models be implemented and what is the timeline if they were approved?

Once a model is approved by the HOD, the work of determining how to restructure AGD to operate based on these models would begin. The first step would be the appointment of an implementation team and the revisions of bylaws/manuals/policies. The expectation is that the overall transition will take a few years for implementation, though all governance changes should be complete by December 2025.

What is the AGD House of Delegates role in finalizing whether a model is selected? Will the HOD have multiple models to vote on?

 The House of Delegates will be asked to vote on one model during the 2024 Annual Meeting in November. It is anticipated that one model will be presented at that time.

Will the new model have regional directors?

The current models do not include regions and therefore there are no regional directors.

Previous FAQs

What is a governance review process?

When an association undergoes a governance review process, it means that the organization is evaluating and potentially revising its governance structure, policies, and practices. Governance refers to the framework of rules, relationships, systems, and processes by which an organization is directed and controlled. The purpose of a governance review is to ensure that the association's governance practices align with its mission, goals, and best practices.

Who typically conducts a governance review?

A governance review is often conducted by an external consultant for this purpose. Hiring a consultant to lead this process can provide several valuable benefits, including objective perspectives, expertise and experience, benchmarking, facilitation skills, opportunity to customize solutions, implementation support, as well confidentiality and impartiality.

Leaders and members of all levels play a key role in this process too.

What aspects of governance are usually examined during a review?

Various aspects of how the organization operates as well as its decision-making processes, roles and responsibilities, communications, etc. are all reviewed. This is an opportunity for members and the association’s leadership to determine if its operations support its goals appropriately.

How often should an association conduct a governance review?

It is really up to the association, but every organization should evaluate whether they are operating effectively and using its resources effectively to support the organization’s mission, vision and values.

What are the potential benefits of a governance review?

A governance review process can offer several benefits to an organization, helping it operate more effectively, transparently, and in alignment with its mission and goals.

How long does a governance review typically take?

We anticipate presenting models created by members and AGD leaders to the AGD House of Delegates in November 2024.

Who is involved in the governance review process?

This process includes various levels of input as well as planning sessions to consider, evaluate and explore ways to make sure the organization is operating effectively.

How are AGD members involved in the review process?

It is important that AGD members share their insights and experience. Every member is invited to be part of the process, including completing surveys, participating in the remodeling summit or evaluating proposed models and modifications. We have sent invitations through email and reminders via newsletters and on social media in the past and will continue to do so. Please watch for invitations and opportunities to get involved.

What role does the Board play in the governance review?

AGD’s Board has been involved in this process, including selection of the consulting firm, review of initial findings from interviews, the virtual town hall sessions, and providing input and review of the models. They will continue to stay apprised of the process so that they can communicate with AGD members who they represent.

What changes might result from a governance review?

Changes from a governance review process can vary depending on the specific findings, goals, and outcomes of the process conducted through AGD members. Any specific changes will depend on the unique circumstances and goals as determined by members who take advantage of the opportunities to participate.

The implementation of recommendations should be done thoughtfully, with consideration for AGD’s culture, mission, and the potential impact on members and the profession AGD represents. Communication and collaboration among all individuals involved are key to successfully implementing changes resulting from a governance review.